LETTERS: The World Health Organisation first declared Covid-19 a global health emergency in January. Since then, the virus has rapidly spread across the world.
Today, there are more than 27 million confirmed cases of Covid-19 worldwide and about 900,000 deaths, touching every continent save the Antarctica.
Apart from its impact on the health sector, the pandemic has adversely affected global economic growth, causing unemployment and raising, as some observers point out, the risks of economic depression.
We are hopeful that it won't be like the Great Depression of the 1930s, negatively impacting on international trade with many arguing that it could unravel globalisation altogether.
Globalisation, which generally refers to a governmental policy favouring free trade, open borders, the free movement of capital, goods and services and elimination of tariffs, is perceived as a key driver of recent unprecedented economic growth around the world.
It is harnessed by the World Trade Organisation, an organisation made up of 164 member countries that deals with the rules of trade between nations ensuring that trade flows as smoothly and predictably as possible. Undoubtedly, the Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted the smooth flow of trade that is essential to protect livelihoods.
However, this pandemic, like the 14th century plague (Black Death) and the 1918 Spanish flu, is transitory and thus it would be premature to announce the demise of globalisation.
Although the Covid-19 may not succeed in unravelling globalisation, its impact on free trade is undeniable, hitting the world economy the hardest and even some mega projects, like China's Belt and Road Initiative, are not immune to it.
On the face of this enormous challenge, what is needed is international cooperation to keep trade flowing, to avoid or minimise protectionist measures (unless for health reasons), to be transparent regarding trade related policies and keep supply chains flowing for essential goods.
So long as international trade keeps flowing, deglobalisation is a remote possibility.
DR MOHAMMAD NAQIB EISHAN JAN
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of the New Straits Times