IN the dynamic world of sports, where innovation meets tradition, few games have ignited as much debate in this country as pickleball. Originally an American creation, this fast-paced, paddle-based sport is now sweeping across the nation.
Courts are sprouting in cities and towns, badminton halls have begun sharing space with the game, and players of racket sports like tennis, squash and ping pong are transitioning to it with ease. Yet, this meteoric rise has also sparked controversy, particularly, I've noted lately, among hardcore badminton enthusiasts.
The recent announcement by the Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari regarding plans to introduce pickleball as a medal sport in the 2026 Malaysia Games (Sukma) seems to have added more fuel to the fire, eliciting cries from (particularly) badminton traditionalists who dismiss the game as a mere fad, unworthy of recognition.
But is this criticism fair?
BORN TO THRIVE
Pickleball may be relatively new to this country, but it's far from a fleeting trend. Globally, it's recognised as one of the fastest-growing sports. In the United States alone, the number of players surged from 3.5 million in 2019 to 8.9 million last year, according to the Sports & Fitness Industry Association. The sport has seen growth rates exceeding 35 per cent annually, a pace that few traditional sports can match.
Malaysia, known for its sporting prowess, is no exception to this trend. The pickleball community has reported a sharp increase in participation, with many active clubs and teams sprouting up nationwide as of 2024, and new courts being built to meet demand. Players transitioning from badminton, tennis, and squash appear to find pickleball's emphasis on strategy, agility, and teamwork both challenging and rewarding.
NOT A RIVAL, BUT AN ALLY
Post anything about pickleball on social media, and brace yourself for a storm of criticism — often from the badminton camp. Keyboard warriors are quick to emerge, launching waves of disdain as they dismiss the sport's credibility. It's a bitter battle of words, as they fiercely defend badminton, our cherished national pastime, against what they see as an unworthy challenger.
But, do the two sports really need to be adversaries? Why not just coexist and complement each other? Pickleball offers an accessible entry point for individuals of all ages and fitness levels, creating opportunities for families, retirees and those seeking casual recreational play.
For younger athletes, pickleball provides a platform to develop skills like footwork, reflexes, and shot placement, which can benefit badminton players as well. Instead of diminishing badminton's appeal, pickleball has the potential to expand Malaysia's sporting culture and attract individuals who might not otherwise engage in sports.
FROM FAD TO FUTURE
The argument that pickleball is a passing fad overlooks its adaptability and community-driven appeal. Unlike many sports that require specialised equipment or facilities, pickleball is inexpensive and easy to set up. This accessibility ensures its long-term sustainability.
Moreover, its (potential) inclusion in major events like Sukma signals a growing recognition of pickleball as a legitimate sport. Globally, professional pickleball leagues are emerging, and international tournaments are drawing attention. With our country's proven talent in racket sports, the nation could potentially produce a world champion in pickleball.
OVERCOMING CHALLENGES
Admittedly, the rapid rise of pickleball has led to some logistical challenges, particularly when it comes to shared spaces in badminton halls and community centres. As pickleball enthusiasts and badminton players compete for limited court time, tensions have simmered.
Both sports require specific configurations and equipment, which can cause friction when the courts are in high demand. However, this challenge offers an opportunity for sports administrators to think creatively and implement solutions that can benefit all players, regardless of their sport of choice.
One possible solution is to introduce flexible court scheduling. By allocating dedicated time slots for each sport, facilities can ensure that players of both games have fair access to space.
Additionally, rotational schedules could be implemented, where courts are shared in intervals, allowing players from both camps to experience different sports while minimising clashes. These approaches require effective communication and collaboration between sports clubs and venues, but it will definitely help to maintain harmony.
Another innovative idea is the construction of multipurpose, convertible courts. Some badminton halls may be redesigned to easily transition between the two sports. For instance, retractable net systems or modular court markings will allow a court to seamlessly switch between badminton and pickleball setups within minutes. This allows facilities to maximise their use without requiring separate spaces for each sport.
In certain urban areas, where space is limited, outdoor pickleball courts can be integrated into existing recreational parks alongside other sports facilities. Outdoor courts are often less expensive to build and maintain, and their availability can alleviate demand for indoor badminton courts.
By creating dedicated pickleball spaces in the open air, Malaysia can create a broader and more inclusive sporting infrastructure that welcomes diverse communities.
Moreover, community-driven partnerships between badminton and pickleball clubs could help facilitate shared resources, promote sports education, and host joint tournaments. Such events should foster unity, not rivalry, and bring the two communities together in a celebration of sport rather than conflict. Shared training programmes, coaching clinics, and outreach efforts will also help build bridges, promoting sportsmanship and mutual respect.
Lastly, investing in education about both sports can reduce misunderstandings and resistance. Through outreach programmes, social media campaigns, and local awareness efforts, sports authorities may highlight how pickleball and badminton can complement each other rather than compete. A unified message of inclusivity and shared passion for sport could shift perceptions and encourage a culture of mutual support rather than division.
The ultimate goal must be to build an ecosystem where sports, regardless of their form, may thrive side by side. Instead of viewing the rapid growth of pickleball as a threat to badminton, Malaysia can embrace this as an opportunity to innovate, improve facilities, and foster a more inclusive sporting culture — one where all athletes, young and old, competitive and recreational, can find a place to play.
EMBRACING THE NEW
It's natural for established sports to feel protective of their territory when a newcomer gains traction. However, our country's rich sporting history is built on embracing change and innovation. Badminton itself was once a new sport, introduced during the British colonial era. Who's to say that pickleball won't follow a similar trajectory?
Instead of resisting this wave, Malaysia has an opportunity to ride it. By embracing pickleball's rise, the country stands to benefit far more than it risks losing. This isn't about choosing between badminton and pickleball — it's about expanding our sporting identity and creating a richer, more inclusive landscape that serves everyone. Instead of a battle between old and new, let this be a partnership that brings out the best in both worlds.
Pickleball isn't a fad. It's the future. And one that's here to stay.