ALOR STAR: Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor has downplayed the impact of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's legal suit against him on the relationship between the state and federal government.
Sanusi stressed that the defamation suit was strictly a personal issue between him and Anwar, thus nothing to do with state and federal affairs.
"This (legal suit) is between Anwar Ibrahim and Muhammad Sanusi. It has nothing to do with the relationship between state and federal governments.
"I will not let this issue to strain that relationship," he told reporters after attending the Darul Aman Literature Awards presentation ceremony at Muda Agricultural Authority (Mada) headquarters here last night.
Sanusi, who is also the state Perikatan Nasional (PN) chairman, however, pointed out that it would be unfair if the Tambun Member of Parliament chose to use the issue to impose discriminatory policies against the state government.
"If he chooses to use this issue to implement discriminatory policies towards the state government, I would say he has really gone "koyak" (torn).
"Like I said before, you can get irritated but don't get koyak," quipped Sanusi.
On Tuesday, Anwar had filed a legal suit against Sanusi over the latter's statement insinuating that the prime minister was immoral.
Sanusi had allegedly made the slanderous statement at a ceramah in Tambun during the 15th General Election (GE15) campaign.
Later in the evening, Sanusi responded through Facebook stating that was ready to face Anwar in court over the defamation suit
In his post, Sanusi, 48, who is also Kedah Pas' deputy commissioner, said: "I'll see you in court, lah. We'll talk about history."
Sanusi stopped short on elaborating further regarding history that he wished to dig up on the PM but had uploaded pictures of several legal documents to accompany his one line posting.
It was reported that Anwar, through his solicitors SN Nair & Partners, filed the suit at the Alor Star High Court and named Sanusi as the defendant.
Anwar claimed that the Kedah Perikatan Nasional (PN) chairman, had on Nov 13, given a ceramah in support of the coalition's Tambun parliamentary candidate Datuk Seri Ahmad Faizal Azumu, which was attended by tens of thousands of supporters.
Sanusi, in the speech, had allegedly claimed that Anwar is a fraud, untrustworthy and unethical and had betrayed the people's mandate.
The PN chairman also claimed that Anwar's full pardon by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong was not obtained according to protocol and procedures and that Anwar was a criminal who had committed an offence which remains on record.
Sanusi, in making the speech, also claimed that Anwar is "out of akhlak", and that he is not a good Muslim.
Recordings of Sanusi's speech were uploaded on a Facebook page under the "Faizal Azumu" account, where it had garnered over 88,000 views to date.
These speeches were reported in both Bahasa Malaysia and English by MalaysiaKini on Nov 14.
Anwar had on Nov 16 demanded Sanusi withdraw the statement, issue an apology as well as promise to not repeat the slanderous statements, as well as to make monetary compensation for the damages done by the statement.
However, Sanusi, through his lawyers, had replied to Anwar's statement of claim on Dec 7, where he had expressed an unequivocal acknowledgement of the facts said in that speech.
Anwar, in the writ of demand, claimed that he had been humiliated and ridiculed by the community, following these statements.
He also claimed that the speeches caused him to suffer from anxiety, mental stress and extreme humiliation and that it tainted his good reputation as the prime minister, finance minister, Tambun member of parliament, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) president and Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman.
Anwar is seeking compensation on general, severe and exemplary damages, as well as an injunction order to restrain the defendant from further disclosing, composing or publishing similar statements against him.
He is also seeking for the defendant to pay five per cent per year on the sum of the judgment, from the date of accrual of action until the date of full settlement, costs of a solicitor and client basis, as well as other reliefs that the court deems fair and appropriate.