Tiny pieces of plastic have been found littered in human bodies, trapped in our lungs and laced through our blood, but the long-term health effects of this exposure remain unclear.
Every day humans ingest, inhale or otherwise come in contact with microplastics, plastic pollution less than 5mm in diameter that is mostly invisible to the naked eye.
Microplastics have been found almost everywhere on Earth, from the deepest oceans to the highest mountains, as well as in the air, water, soil and food chains.
But in the last couple of years, scientists have discovered microplastics not just in nature but also in human bodies, detecting it in lungs, livers and even placentas.
Last year, a Dutch study became the first to identify microplastics in human blood.
While scientists have urged caution due to the study's small sample size, the presence of microplastics could suggest it is being transported through the bloodstream to organs.
But for now, the data remain incomplete on the health effects of microplastics, a complex cocktail of polymers and chemicals that could smuggle in other contaminants in what is called the Trojan Horse effect.
Xavier Coumoul, a toxicologist at French medical research institute INSERM, said there had been "more and more research" in the area over the last decade.
But he said research had been late to get started because, similar to global warming, the "insidious changes" crept up so slowly.
"We do not know whether our level of exposure will lead to chronic or acute illnesses in the long term, but we can legitimately ask the question."
Research has shown that microplastics have a range of detrimental effects on the health of animals, including an increase in inflammation, oxidative stress and damage to cells.
"In human and mice lung tissues, we have seen an inhibitory effect on development after putting plastic fibres inside organoids, mini-lungs grown" from stem cells, said Barbro Melgert, a respiratory immunologist at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands.
"This effect seemed not to be caused by the plastic itself, but by something leaking from the (plastic particles), some chemicals added," she said.
"But we don't know what chemical was involved. It's difficult to find out, especially with low quantities."
Indeed, the roles that the shape, size and type of microplastic, as well as additives, remain poorly understood. But researchers are working on it.
Last week, a study in the journal Physics of Fluid modelled how different sizes of inhaled microplastics rattled through human airways, finding that they tended to collect in the nasal cavity or in the back of the throat.
It is also unclear how much microplastic individual people are exposed to.
The World Wildlife Fund made headlines in 2019 by estimating that people ingest around 5g of plastic a week, the equivalent of a credit card.
The methodology and findings of the study the WWF was citing have been contested, and other research has indicated a lower level of individual exposure.
Coumoul compared microplastics to pesticides, saying "it has sometimes taken a long time to identify the long-term risk to humans".
"Let's try to prevent a time bomb," Melgert said. And an even greater tidal wave of plastic looms on the horizon.
On current trends, annual production of fossil-fuel plastic will nearly triple by 2060 to 1.2 billion tonnes.
Earlier this month, there was some rare goods news in the fight against plastic pollution.
After five days of gruelling talks, 175 nations gathered in Paris agreed to reveal the first draft of a much-anticipated plastic pollution treaty by the end of November.
For now, experts recommend that people limit their exposure to microplastics by ventilating their homes, not eating out of plastic containers and avoiding synthetic textiles, such as polyester.
The writer is from the Agence France-Presse news agency