LETTERS: The recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports of an increased precipitation in Southeast Asia as one of the impacts of climate change.
The IPCC 2021 report is deemed as a code red for humanity, as the report concludes that we will certainly warm by at least 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial revolution levels by 2040, and if we don't do anything about it quickly, we will reach those levels sooner.
A flash flood causing deaths in Yan, Kedah, recently should spark an urgent call to discuss and act on the root of the issue, which is climate change. But it doesn't. We failed to capitalise on the opportunity to alert the public on the perils of climate change.
Perhaps this is due to the complexity of climate change which makes it difficult to be understood. Throughout history, humans identify and act on immediate threats, such as wild animals or enemy soldiers.
However, climate change is a more abstract and long-term threat. People cannot feel the urgency to act when all they see, and feel is some hot days and heavy rains. Nevertheless, the hot days and heavy rains are just a taste of what is coming.
At the current state, we are at 1 degree Celsius warmer than the pre-industrial revolution temperatures. Even now, an extreme heat event that used to occur once in a decade, now occurs 2.8 times a decade. When we reach 1.5 degrees Celsius, the occurrence of extreme heat events will increase to 4.1 times a decade.
At the current rate of greenhouse gasses emissions, we will reach 1.5 degrees Celsius warming by 2040, and 2 degrees Celsius warming by 2060. However, not all is lost.
If we markedly reduce our emissions, we might still be able to reverse the warming of our planet. That is why we designate Sept 21 to be Zero Emissions Day, to raise awareness on our carbon emissions and its impact on our planet.
So, how do we reduce our carbon emissions down to net-zero? Individually, we can take steps to reduce our carbon footprint. According to Wynes and Nicholas (2017), some of the actions that give a major impact in reducing our carbon footprint are having fewer children, living car-free, buying green technology, and going vegan.
Nevertheless, individual actions are limited by convenience and circumstances. For example, car free living in Malaysia is not as easy as some other developed nations.
According to Sustainable Cities Mobility Index 2017, Kuala Lumpur is ranked number 95 out of 100 cities for public transport. In some places, there is virtually no public transport available, which renders car-free living a non-viable option.
In some countries such as Norway, using electric or hydrogen cars is a major part of reducing individual carbon footprint. In Malaysia however, electric cars are much more expensive than regular internal combustion engine cars. Encouraging the use of electric cars is pointless when a whopping 79.9 per cent of our electricity is generated from fossil fuels.
Relying on individual actions alone is like throwing a bucket of water to put out a forest fire. Climate change is a systemic problem involving industries and corporations, and shouldering the burden of addressing it to individual consumers alone is unfair.
According to Climate Risk Disclosure Barometer 2020 Malaysia, the top 100 public-listed companies in Malaysia lack comprehensive climate risk disclosure. This alone shows lack of awareness and drive by corporations to achieve net-zero emissions.
To fix a problem of this magnitude, we need collective action. As eloquently put by Christine Lagarde, a former Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, "tackling climate change is a collective endeavour, it means collective accountability and it is not too late."
Society must band together and call for a systemic reform through policies and legislation. The government should enact policies to steer the nation towards net-zero carbon emission.
For example, providing a more efficient public transportation system, creating better conditions for cyclists while limiting the usage of vehicles through the establishment of car-free zones will lessen the need to buy vehicles.
A real example of such policy is the Roadmap Towards Zero Single-Use Plastics 2018-2030. As single-use plastics are estimated to contribute up to 10 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, this policy puts forward a step-by-step plan to eradicate the use of single use plastics in Malaysia by introducing pollution levies, incentives for industries to move away from single use plastics, and funding for research and development of alternatives for single use plastics.
The legislature can enact legislation to ease corporations towards net-zero carbon emissions. For instance, Singapore has enacted the Carbon Pricing Act 2018, which taxes industrial facilities emitting greenhouse gasses equal to or above 25,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Taxing emissions incentivises corporations to find ways to reduce carbon emissions to maximize their profits.
Producing such policies and legislation requires political will, as it will not come easy as it is unpopular and inconvenient, especially towards the industry. The pushback from the plastic straw ban gives us a glimpse of the challenges the government will face on the road to zero carbon emission. If that is how people felt about forgoing straws, how will the people react when bigger lifestyle changes such as car-free living are proposed?
The increasing popularity of taking climate action cannot be overstated. How do we achieve that? Through raising awareness. Campaigns, rallies, protests, discussions, and others. The clock is ticking. Time is running out. The earth is warming. It is time to help each other out.
With the 2022 Budget due within a few weeks, can we count on the government and the legislature to pass a Supply Bill 2022 that includes a green recovery of our economy so that we can build a greener future for the generations to come?
Collective action is needed, surely. These are things to ponder on Zero Emissions Day, today.
Azhari Azizi
IKRAM Muda Malaysia
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of the New Straits Times